**Expert Insights: An Interview Perspective**
*By: The Theoretical Learning Center Group of the Shanxi Provincial Party School (Shanxi Administrative Institute)*
In recent discussions surrounding the Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party, a clear mandate was established for the development of a robust and locally adapted system for new productive forces. This locally tailored approach embodies the fundamental Marxist principle of practicality and realism, promoting strategic clarity that is essential for navigating the latest rounds of technological and industrial transformations. Such methodologies will be crucial in facilitating the high-quality development of productive forces.
When considering economic growth, it is vital to respect objective economic laws. President Xi Jinping has cautioned against the impulse to rush into action without adhering to established principles. Instead of chasing immediate results, we must cultivate a grounded mindset focused on modernization. The drive to develop new productive forces is inherently linked to the requirements of high-quality growth. While urgency is necessary, it is imperative that we do not engage in hasty or blind initiatives. We should approach the relationship between traditional and emerging industries with nuance. Traditional industries shouldn’t be dismissed as outdated; rather, they contain potential for innovation and renewal through technological advancement and transformation. It is essential that we do not prematurely dismantle old industries or models before establishing new ones and that we balance the roles of government and market forces, optimizing resource allocation while also harnessing governmental support to stimulate societal innovation.
Leveraging comparative advantages is another key component. Given China’s vast territory, the development of new productive forces cannot follow a one-size-fits-all model. We must select strategies that are tailored to local conditions while pushing for the emergence of new industries and dynamics. A thorough understanding of the Central Committee’s strategic positioning for various regions is crucial; this involves seeing local development as part of the broader national picture while enhancing regional strengths to transform comparative advantages into competitive ones. Emphasizing specialized and advantageous industries, directing policy resources accordingly, is necessary for fostering growth. Moreover, being aware of global competitive landscapes allows us to tap into worldwide innovation resources, opening new areas of opportunity.
Innovation is paramount. The characteristics of new productive forces are defined by innovation, emphasizing quality over quantity. Our technological advancement should be forefront, allowing us to break from traditional economic growth and productivity models. By prioritizing scientific and technological innovation, we can seize opportunities presented by the current technological revolution. It is vital to expedite the transformation of technological achievements into tangible productive capabilities while strengthening the role of enterprises in innovation processes and fostering collaborative research ecosystems. Establishing a globally competitive open innovation environment will further enhance international collaboration and cultivate a vibrant research landscape.
Lastly, reforming our institutional frameworks is essential. According to Marxist theory, the nature of production relations must align with advancements in productive forces. We must put reform at the forefront, fostering new relations that are congruent with the development of productive forces. This includes the integration of education, technology, and talent cultivation reforms, and actively implementing national strategies for innovation and talent sourcing, thereby enhancing the efficacy of our national innovation system. It’s also crucial to support modern industrial systems, optimizing the transformation of key industries while promoting the fusion of manufacturing and services across traditional and digital economies. By refining mechanisms for income distribution among production factors, we can stimulate the contributions of labor, knowledge, and innovation, ultimately creating an environment that encourages creativity and embraces the potential for failure as part of the innovation journey. (Guangming Daily)
